Alternative
Looking for a Bombora Alternative?
First-party intent from your website vs. third-party data
Bombora provides third-party intent data showing who's researching topics across the web. Bullseye provides first-party intent—who's actually on YOUR website. First-party signals are more specific and actionable.
Why Teams Switch from Bombora
Third-party intent is less specific than website visits
Someone on your site shows stronger intent than general research
Bullseye provides person-level data, not just accounts
Real-time alerts vs. batch data updates
More affordable for focused visitor identification
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Bullseye | Bombora |
|---|---|---|
| Intent data | First-party | Third-party |
| Website visitor identification | ||
| Person-level data | ||
| Topic/keyword signals | Pages viewed | |
| Real-time alerts | Batch updates | |
| Company surge data | Website surge | |
| Self-serve | ||
| Accessible pricing |
Common Bombora Limitations
- Third-party intent is inferential
- Account-level data only
- Requires integration with other tools
- Batch data delivery, not real-time
- Enterprise-focused pricing
Pricing Comparison
Bullseye
Starting at $99/month
Transparent, scalable pricing
- Free trial available
- No long-term contracts
- Self-serve signup
Bombora
Custom enterprise pricing
Varies by plan and features
Which is Right for You?
Bombora is great for broad category intent signals. Bullseye is better for identifying specific visitors to your website.
Ready to try Bullseye?
Start identifying your website visitors with a free trial. No credit card required.